Weak cosmic censorship in gravitational collapse with astrophysical parameter values
Umpei Miyamoto, Sanjay Jhingan, Tomohiro Harada

TL;DR
This paper argues that under realistic astrophysical conditions, gravitational collapse does not violate the weak cosmic censorship hypothesis, as strong gravitational fields prevent null rays from escaping the singularity.
Contribution
It provides negative evidence against the violation of weak cosmic censorship in astrophysical collapse scenarios with negligible asymmetry and typical parameter values.
Findings
Collapse objects with mass > 1.5 M_sun trap null rays early.
Density > 1.5 x 10^{15} g/cm^3 prevents null ray escape.
Weak cosmic censorship holds under realistic astrophysical parameters.
Abstract
The possible violation of the weak cosmic censorship hypothesis in astrophysical phenomena can provide us with the information about trans-Planckian physics through observations. We present negative evidence, however, that one should not expect such a possibility at least when the deviation from spherical symmetry is negligible and the parameter values of collapse are astrophysically reasonable. Taking the Lema\^itre-Tolman-Bondi solution as the model most likely to counter the weak hypothesis, we show that the mass () and density () of the collapsing object produce a gravitational field strong enough to capture any null rays soon after emanating from the singularity.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
