Non-Noetherianity of Denjoy-Carleman rings of germs
Liat Kessler, Andreea C. Nicoara

TL;DR
This paper proves that certain Denjoy-Carleman rings of germs of functions in multiple variables are not Noetherian, resolving a long-standing open problem in real algebraic geometry by linking their non-Noetherianity to failure of Weierstrass division.
Contribution
It establishes the non-Noetherian nature of Denjoy-Carleman quasi-analytic rings of germs, using failure of Weierstrass division and advanced approximation techniques.
Findings
Denjoy-Carleman rings are not Noetherian if larger than real-analytic germs.
Failure of Weierstrass division implies non-Noetherianity.
Resolves a 35-year-old open problem in real algebraic geometry.
Abstract
It is shown that Denjoy-Carleman quasi analytic rings of germs of functions in two or more variables either complex or real valued that are stable under derivation and strictly larger than the ring of real-analytic germs are not Noetherian rings. The failure of Weierstrass division on these Denjoy-Carleman classes yields a contradiction to Noetherianity via a stronger version of Artin Approximation due to Popescu as well as results on projective modules. This settles a 35-year old open problem in real algebraic geometry.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCommutative Algebra and Its Applications · Rings, Modules, and Algebras · Polynomial and algebraic computation
