Three Applications to Rational Relations of the High Undecidability of the Infinite Post Correspondence Problem in a Regular omega-Language
Olivier Finkel (ELM)

TL;DR
This paper proves that several decision problems related to infinite Post Correspondence Problems, rational relations, and omega-rational functions are highly undecidable, specifically $oldsymbol{ ext{Sigma}}_1^1$-complete or $oldsymbol{ ext{Pi}}_1^1$-complete, highlighting their complexity beyond arithmetical hierarchy.
Contribution
It establishes the $oldsymbol{ ext{Sigma}}_1^1$-completeness of the infinite Post Correspondence Problem in regular omega-languages and the $oldsymbol{ ext{Pi}}_1^1$-completeness of related problems about omega-rational functions, providing exact complexities.
Findings
Infinite Post Correspondence Problem in regular omega-languages is $oldsymbol{ ext{Sigma}}_1^1$-complete.
Deciding disjointness of infinitary rational relations is $oldsymbol{ ext{Pi}}_1^1$-complete.
Determining the existence of a point of continuity for omega-rational functions is $oldsymbol{ ext{Sigma}}_1^1$-complete, and checking if the continuity set is omega-regular is $oldsymbol{ ext{Pi}}_1^1$-complete.
Abstract
It was noticed by Harel in [Har86] that "one can define -complete versions of the well-known Post Correspondence Problem". We first give a complete proof of this result, showing that the infinite Post Correspondence Problem in a regular -language is -complete, hence located beyond the arithmetical hierarchy and highly undecidable. We infer from this result that it is -complete to determine whether two given infinitary rational relations are disjoint. Then we prove that there is an amazing gap between two decision problems about -rational functions realized by finite state B\"uchi transducers. Indeed Prieur proved in [Pri01, Pri02] that it is decidable whether a given -rational function is continuous, while we show here that it is -complete to determine whether a given -rational function has at least one point…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
