A Higgs Quadruplet for Type III Seesaw and Implications for $\mu \to e\gamma$ and $\mu - e$ Conversion
Bo Ren, Koji Tsumura, Xiao-Gang He

TL;DR
This paper proposes a novel Higgs quadruplet extension to the Type III seesaw model, enabling larger Yukawa couplings and potentially observable lepton flavor violation signals, with implications for collider phenomenology.
Contribution
It introduces a Higgs quadruplet to the Type III seesaw model, allowing a single leptonic triplet to generate neutrino masses and predict observable lepton flavor violation effects.
Findings
Large Yukawa couplings can lead to detectable $oldsymbol{ ext{μ} o e ext{γ}}$ and $oldsymbol{ ext{μ} - e}$ conversion signals.
Constraints from MEG and $oldsymbol{ ext{μ} - e}$ conversion limit the model parameters.
Potential collider signatures include doubly charged Higgs bosons.
Abstract
In Type III seesaw model the heavy neutrinos are contained in leptonic triplet representations. The Yukawa couplings of the triplet fermion and the left-handed neutrinos with the doublet Higgs field produce the Dirac mass terms. Together with the Majorana masses for the leptonic triplets, the light neutrinos obtain non-zero seesaw masses. We point out that it is also possible to have a quadruplet Higgs field to produce the Dirac mass terms to facilitate the seesaw mechanism. The vacuum expectation value of the quadruplet Higgs is constrained to be small by electroweak precision data. Therefore the Yukawa couplings of a quadruplet can be much larger than those for a doublet. We also find that unlike the usual Type III seesaw model where at least two copies of leptonic triplets are needed, with both doublet and quadruplet Higgs representations, just one leptonic triplet is possible to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
