Systematics in the Interpretation of Aggregated Neutrino Flux Limits and Flavor Ratios from Gamma-Ray Bursts
Philipp Baerwald, Svenja H\"ummer, Walter Winter

TL;DR
This paper develops a Monte Carlo simulation approach to interpret aggregated neutrino flux limits from gamma-ray bursts, revealing spectral features and model dependencies relevant for IceCube analyses.
Contribution
It introduces a burst-by-burst Monte Carlo method to analyze diffuse and stacked neutrino fluxes, accounting for flavor ratios and spectral features, improving interpretation of gamma-ray burst neutrino data.
Findings
Spectral features persist in diffuse fluxes dominated by sources at z ≈ 1.
Variations in Lorentz boost are model-dependent and can discriminate source models.
Observation of spectral features can challenge assumptions about Lorentz factors in bursts.
Abstract
Gamma-ray burst analyses at neutrino telescopes are typically based on diffuse or stacked (i.e., aggregated) neutrino fluxes, because the number of events expected from a single burst is small. The interpretation of aggregated flux limits implies new systematics not present for a single burst, such as by the integration over parameter distributions (diffuse fluxes), or by the low statistics in small burst samples (stacked fluxes). We simulate parameter distributions with a Monte Carlo method computing the spectra burst by burst, as compared to a conventional Monte Carlo integration. With this approach, we can predict the behavior of the flux in the diffuse limit as well as in low statistics stacking samples, such as used in recent IceCube data analyses. We also include the flavor composition at the detector (ratio between muon tracks and cascades) into our considerations. We demonstrate…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
