Is SGR 0418+5729 indeed a waning magnetar ?
R. Turolla, S. Zane, J.A. Pons, P. Esposito, N. Rea

TL;DR
This paper proposes that SGR 0418+5729 is an aged magnetar with a decayed magnetic field, explaining its atypically low dipole field and persistent bursting activity through a model of magnetic field decay over approximately one million years.
Contribution
It introduces a magneto-rotational evolution model showing SGR 0418+5729 as an old magnetar with significant magnetic decay, challenging the traditional view of magnetars as ultra-magnetized neutron stars.
Findings
SGR 0418+5729's properties can be explained by magnetic field decay over 1 million years.
The source's thermal spectrum aligns with a low magnetic field and moderate magnetospheric twist.
Crustal fractures and bursting activity are possible despite the low current magnetic field.
Abstract
SGR 0418+5729 is a transient Soft Gamma-ray Repeater which underwent a major outburst in June 2009, during which the emission of short bursts was observed. Its properties appeared quite typical of other sources of the same class until long-term X-ray monitoring failed to detect any period derivative. The present upper limit on implies that the surface dipole field is (Rea et al 2010), well below those measured in other Soft Gamma-ray Repeaters (SGRs) and in the Anomalous X-ray Pulsars (AXPs), a group of similar sources. Both SGRs and AXPs are currently believed to be powered by ultra-magnetized neutron stars (magnetars, --). SGR 0418+5729 hardly seems to fit in such a picture. We show that the magneto-rotational properties of SGR 0418+5729 can be reproduced if this is an aged magnetar, $\approx 1\…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
