Kepler Mission Stellar and Instrument Noise Properties
Ronald L. Gilliland, William J. Chaplin, Edward W. Dunham, Vic S., Argabright, William J. Borucki, Gibor Basri, Stephen T. Bryson, Derek L., Buzasi, Douglas A. Caldwell, Yvonne P. Elsworth, Jon M. Jenkins, David G., Koch, Jeffrey Kolodziejczak, Andrea Miglio, Jeffrey van Cleve

TL;DR
Kepler's high-precision, long-duration observations have enabled detailed analysis of stellar noise, revealing that intrinsic stellar variability is the main contributor to observed noise levels, which slightly exceed initial expectations.
Contribution
This study provides a detailed decomposition of stellar and instrumental noise in Kepler data, enhancing understanding of stellar variability relevant for exoplanet detection.
Findings
Kepler noise levels are about 50% higher than target levels for quiet stars.
Intrinsic stellar noise dominates the observed noise in Kepler data.
Stellar parameters and models accurately reproduce observed stellar noise features.
Abstract
Kepler Mission results are rapidly contributing to fundamentally new discoveries in both the exoplanet and asteroseismology fields. The data returned from Kepler are unique in terms of the number of stars observed, precision of photometry for time series observations, and the temporal extent of high duty cycle observations. As the first mission to provide extensive time series measurements on thousands of stars over months to years at a level hitherto possible only for the Sun, the results from Kepler will vastly increase our knowledge of stellar variability for quiet solar-type stars. Here we report on the stellar noise inferred on the timescale of a few hours of most interest for detection of exoplanets via transits. By design the data from moderately bright Kepler stars are expected to have roughly comparable levels of noise intrinsic to the stars and arising from a combination of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
