Some Non-Classical Approaches to the Branderburger-Keisler Paradox
Can Baskent

TL;DR
This paper explores the Brandenburger-Keisler paradox using non-well-founded set theory and paraconsistent logic, revealing its persistence across different logical frameworks with distinct properties.
Contribution
It introduces non-classical logical frameworks to analyze the paradox, highlighting their effects on the paradox's properties and persistence.
Findings
The paradox persists in both frameworks for category theoretical reasons.
Different properties of the paradox are observed in each framework.
Abstract
In this paper, we discuss a well-known self-referential paradox in foundational game theory, the Brandenburger - Keisler paradox. We approach the paradox from two different perspectives: non-well-founded set theory and paraconsistent logic. We show that the paradox persists in both frameworks for category theoretical reasons, but, with different properties.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Applications · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Game Theory and Voting Systems
