On polyhedral approximations of polytopes for learning Bayes nets
Milan Studeny, David Haws

TL;DR
This paper compares different polyhedral approximations of Bayesian network structure polytopes, showing that an implicit approximation based on imsets provides a closer fit and acts as an LP relaxation.
Contribution
It demonstrates how to transform inequalities between encodings and compares their approximation quality, confirming the implicit imset polytope as a better approximation and LP relaxation.
Findings
Implicit imset polytope approximation is closer than explicit ones.
The transformed inequalities align different encoding frameworks.
The implicit approximation acts as an LP relaxation of the polytope.
Abstract
We review three vector encodings of Bayesian network structures. The first one has recently been applied by Jaakkola 2010, the other two use special integral vectors formerly introduced, called imsets [Studeny 2005, Studeny 2010]. The central topic is the comparison of outer polyhedral approximations of the corresponding polytopes. We show how to transform the inequalities suggested by Jaakkola et al. to the framework of imsets. The result of our comparison is the observation that the implicit polyhedral approximation of the standard imset polytope suggested in [Studeny 2011] gives a closer approximation than the (transformed) explicit polyhedral approximation from [Jaakkola 2010]. Finally, we confirm a conjecture from [Studeny 2011] that the above-mentioned implicit polyhedral approximation of the standard imset polytope is an LP relaxation of the polytope.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Machine Learning and Algorithms · Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
