Why the traditional concept of local hardness does not work
Tamas Gal

TL;DR
The paper critically examines the traditional local hardness concept in density functional theory, demonstrating its fundamental limitations and showing it cannot serve as a meaningful local measure of chemical hardness.
Contribution
It reveals that the traditional approach to defining local hardness is inherently flawed and cannot produce a valid local hardness indicator, challenging longstanding assumptions.
Findings
Traditional local hardness measures are limited and often meaningless.
Dropping the external potential constraint leads to trivial constant values.
The approach cannot produce a true local hardness indicator.
Abstract
Finding a proper local measure of chemical hardness has been a long-standing aim of density functional theory. The traditional approach to defining a local hardness index, by the derivative of the chemical potential with respect to the electron density subject to the constraint of a fixed external potential, has raised several questions, and its chemical applicability has proved to be limited. Here, we point out that the only actual possibility to obtain a local hardness measure in the traditional approach emerges if the external potential constraint is dropped; consequently, utilizing the ambiguity of a restricted chemical potential derivative is not an option to gain alternative definitions of local hardness. At the same time, however, the arising local hardness concept turns out to be fatally undermined by its inherent connection with the asymptotic value of the second derivative of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
