Bayesian analysis of the astrobiological implications of life's early emergence on Earth
David S. Spiegel (1), Edwin L. Turner (1, 2), ((1) Princeton, (2), IPMU, University of Tokyo)

TL;DR
This paper uses Bayesian analysis to evaluate how early life emergence on Earth influences the perceived likelihood of abiogenesis, highlighting the impact of prior assumptions and the need for independent origins evidence.
Contribution
It introduces a Bayesian framework to quantify the probability of abiogenesis based on early Earth life emergence data and discusses how priors affect the conclusions.
Findings
Early life emergence suggests possible commonality of life in the universe.
The evidence is highly sensitive to the choice of Bayesian prior.
Independent origins of life would significantly strengthen the case for life's ubiquity.
Abstract
Life arose on Earth sometime in the first few hundred million years after the young planet had cooled to the point that it could support water-based organisms on its surface. The early emergence of life on Earth has been taken as evidence that the probability of abiogenesis is high, if starting from young-Earth-like conditions. We revisit this argument quantitatively in a Bayesian statistical framework. By constructing a simple model of the probability of abiogenesis, we calculate a Bayesian estimate of its posterior probability, given the data that life emerged fairly early in Earth's history and that, billions of years later, curious creatures noted this fact and considered its implications. We find that, given only this very limited empirical information, the choice of Bayesian prior for the abiogenesis probability parameter has a dominant influence on the computed posterior…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
