Hipparcos Variable Star Detection and Classification Efficiency
P. Dubath, I. Lecoeur-Ta\"ibi, L. Rimoldini, M. S\"uveges, J. Blomme,, M. L\'opez, L. M. Sarro, J. De Ridder, J. Cuypers, L. Guy, K. Nienartowicz,, A. Jan, M. Beck, N. Mowlavi, P. De Cat, T. Lebzelter, L. Eyer

TL;DR
This study develops and tests a star detection and classification scheme using Hipparcos data, achieving high efficiency in identifying known variables and reducing false positives through a combination of variability criteria and machine learning.
Contribution
It introduces a novel combined variability detection and random forest classification approach for variable star identification in the Hipparcos catalogue.
Findings
Identified 17,006 variability candidates from 115,152 stars.
Correctly classified 82% of known periodic variables.
Reduced contamination of non-periodic variables to 7.5%."
Abstract
A complete periodic star extraction and classification scheme is set up and tested with the Hipparcos catalogue. The efficiency of each step is derived by comparing the results with prior knowledge coming from the catalogue or from the literature. A combination of two variability criteria is applied in the first step to select 17 006 variability candidates from a complete sample of 115 152 stars. Our candidate sample turns out to include 10 406 known variables (i.e., 90% of the total of 11 597) and 6600 contaminating constant stars. A random forest classification is used in the second step to extract 1881 (82%) of the known periodic objects while removing entirely constant stars from the sample and limiting the contamination of non-periodic variables to 152 stars (7.5%). The confusion introduced by these 152 non-periodic variables is evaluated in the third step using the results of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
