Graviton mass bounds from space-based gravitational-wave observations of massive black hole populations
Emanuele Berti, Jonathan Gair, Alberto Sesana

TL;DR
Space-based gravitational-wave detectors like LISA can significantly improve bounds on the graviton mass by observing multiple black hole inspirals, potentially approaching cosmological constraints and testing modifications to general relativity.
Contribution
This paper demonstrates that observing multiple black hole inspirals with space-based detectors can tighten bounds on the graviton mass beyond individual event limits, with a method applicable to various theories of gravity.
Findings
Combined observations improve bounds faster than sqrt(number of events)
Estimated bound on graviton wavelength is ~3x10^16 km with ~50 events
Bounds are only mildly dependent on black hole formation and detector details
Abstract
Space-based gravitational-wave detectors, such as LISA or a similar ESA-led mission, will offer unique opportunities to test general relativity. We study the bounds that space-based detectors could place on the graviton Compton wavelength \lambda_g=h/(m_g c) by observing multiple inspiralling black hole binaries. We show that while observations of individual inspirals will yield mean bounds \lambda_g~3x10^15 km, the combined bound from observing ~50 events in a two-year mission is about ten times better: \lambda_g~3x10^16 km (m_g~4x10^-26 eV). The bound improves faster than the square root of the number of observed events, because typically a few sources provide constraints as much as three times better than the mean. This result is only mildly dependent on details of black hole formation and detector characteristics. The bound achievable in practice should be one order of magnitude…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
