Multidimensional Study of Hadronization in Nuclei
HERMES Collaboration: A. Airapetian, N. Akopov, Z. Akopov, E.C., Aschenauer, W. Augustyniak, R. Avakian, A. Avetissian, E. Avetisyan, S., Belostotski, N. Bianchi, H.P. Blok, A. Borissov, J. Bowles, I. Brodski, V., Bryzgalov, J. Burns, M. Capiluppi, G.P. Capitani, E. Cisbani

TL;DR
This study investigates how different hadrons are produced in nuclei during deep-inelastic scattering, revealing new features in their multiplicity ratios and behaviors across various kinematic variables.
Contribution
It provides a multidimensional analysis of hadronization in nuclei, highlighting differences among hadron types and kinematic dependencies not previously observed.
Findings
Positive kaons do not show the expected rise in multiplicity ratio at high z.
Protons exhibit distinct behavior compared to other hadrons.
New features observed in hadron multiplicity ratios as functions of multiple variables.
Abstract
Hadron multiplicities in semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering were measured on neon, krypton and xenon targets relative to deuterium at an electron(positron)-beam energy of 27.6 GeV at HERMES. These ratios were determined as a function of the virtual-photon energy nu, its virtuality Q2, the fractional hadron energy z and the transverse hadron momentum with respect to the virtual-photon direction pt . Dependences were analysed separately for positively and negatively charged pions and kaons as well as protons and antiprotons in a two-dimensional representation. Compared to the one-dimensional dependences, some new features were observed. In particular, when z > 0.4 positive kaons do not show the strong monotonic rise of the multiplicity ratio with nu as exhibited by pions and negative kaons. Protons were found to behave very differently from the other hadrons.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
