A Critical Discussion About The Methodology Of Quantum Theory
M. Ferrero, D. Salgado, J.L. Sanchez-Gomez

TL;DR
This paper critiques the traditional realist methodology in physics, arguing it conflicts with quantum mechanics, and proposes an alternative approach based on human experience as the foundation of scientific understanding.
Contribution
It challenges the classical realist methodology in quantum physics and suggests an experience-based approach aligned with quantum formalism.
Findings
Quantum mechanics violates classical foundational principles.
Traditional methodology is incompatible with quantum formalism.
An experience-based scientific methodology is proposed.
Abstract
It is argued that the traditional "realist" methodology of physics, according to which human concepts, laws and theories can grasp the essence of reality, is incompatible with the most fruitful interpretation of quantum formalism. The proof rests on the violation by quantum mechanics of the foundational principles of that methodology. An alternative methodology, in which the construction of sciences finishes at the level of human experience, as standard quantum theory strongly suggests, is then conjectured.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Biofield Effects and Biophysics · Philosophy and History of Science
