An HST/WFC3-IR Morphological Survey of Galaxies at z = 1.5-3.6: I. Survey Description and Morphological Properties of Star Forming Galaxies
David R. Law, Charles C. Steidel, Alice E. Shapley, Sarah R. Nagy,, Naveen A. Reddy, Dawn K. Erb

TL;DR
This study uses HST/WFC3 imaging to analyze the rest-frame optical morphologies of star forming galaxies at redshifts 1.5 to 3.6, revealing their sizes, shapes, and structural properties, and exploring their relation to galaxy mergers and evolution.
Contribution
First detailed morphological survey of star forming galaxies at z=1.5-3.6 using HST/WFC3, providing insights into their sizes, shapes, and merger characteristics.
Findings
Galaxies have effective radii of 0.7-3.0 kpc, following a stellar mass-radius relation at z~3.
Galaxy shapes are better described by triaxial systems than inclined disks.
Meromorphic features do not strongly correlate with physical properties like stellar mass or star formation rate.
Abstract
We present the results of a 42-orbit HST/WFC3 survey of the rest-frame optical morphologies of star forming galaxies with spectroscopic redshifts in the range z=1.5-3.6. The survey consists of 42 orbits of F160W imaging covering ~65 arcmin^2 distributed widely across the sky and reaching a depth of 27.9 AB for a 5 sigma detection within a 0.2 arcsec radius aperture. Focusing on an optically selected sample of 306 star forming galaxies with stellar masses in the range M* = 10^9 - 10^11 Msun, we find that typical circularized effective half-light radii range from ~ 0.7 - 3.0 kpc and describe a stellar mass - radius relation as early as z ~ 3. While these galaxies are best described by an exponential surface brightness profile, their distribution of axis ratios is strongly inconsistent with a population of inclined exponential disks and is better reproduced by triaxial stellar systems with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
