Predicting the Merger Fraction of Lyman alpha Emitters from Redshift z~3 to z~7
Vithal Tilvi, Evan Scannapieco, Sangeeta Malhotra, and James E. Rhoads, (School of Earth & Space Exploration, Arizona State University)

TL;DR
This study predicts the evolution of merger fractions in high-redshift Lyman-alpha emitters from z~3 to z~7 using simulations and a model linking star formation to mass accretion, highlighting mergers' role in star formation.
Contribution
It introduces a model where star formation in Lyman-alpha emitters is proportional to mass accretion rate, and predicts merger fractions over a wide redshift range, aligning with observations.
Findings
Major merger fraction increases from 35% at z~3 to 50% at z~7.
Predicted merger fractions suggest mergers significantly drive star formation in high-redshift Lya emitters.
Future observations with a 3:1 merger definition will find >30% major merger fraction at z>3.
Abstract
Rapid mass assembly, likely from mergers or smooth accretion, has been predicted to play a vital role in star-formation in high-redshift Lyman-alpha (Lya) emitters. Here we predict the major merger, minor merger, and smooth accreting Lya emitter fraction from z~3 to z~7 using a large dark matter simulation, and a simple physical model that is successful in reproducing many observations over this large redshift range. The central tenet of this model, different from many of the earlier models, is that the star-formation in Lya emitters is proportional to the mass accretion rate rather than the total halo mass. We find that at z~3, nearly 35% of the Lya emitters accrete their mass through major (3:1) mergers, and this fraction increases to about 50% at z~7. This imply that the star-formation in a large fraction of high-redshift Lya emitters is driven by mergers. While there is discrepancy…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
