WISE/NEOWISE observations of comet 103P/Hartley 2
James M. Bauer, Russell G. Walker, A. K. Mainzer, Joseph R. Masiero,, Tommy Grav, John W. Dailey, Robert S. McMillan, Carey M. Lisse, Yan R., Fern\'andez, Karen J. Meech, Jana Pittichova, Erin K. Blauvelt, Frank J., Masci, Michael F. A'Hearn, Roc M. Cutri, James V. Scotti

TL;DR
This study uses WISE/NEOWISE mid-infrared data to analyze comet 103P/Hartley 2's dust, nucleus size, and gas emissions, providing new insights into its particle distribution, composition, and trail mass.
Contribution
It presents the first detailed mid-infrared analysis of comet 103P/Hartley 2, including dust size distribution, nucleus size, and gas production rates, based on WISE/NEOWISE observations.
Findings
Dust particle size distribution with a power-law slope of -0.97
Nucleus radius estimated at 0.6 km
Carbon dioxide production rate of 3.5 x 10^24 molecules/sec
Abstract
We report results based on mid-infrared photometry of comet 103P/Hartley 2 taken during May 4-13, 2010 (when the comet was at a heliocentric distance of 2.3 AU, and an observer distance of 2.0 AU) by the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (Wright et al. 2010). Photometry of the coma at 22 microns and data from the University of Hawaii 2.2-m telescope obtained on May 22, 2010 provide constraints on the dust particle size distribution, dlogn/dlogm, yielding power-law slope values of alpha = -0.97 +/- 0.10, steeper than that found for the inbound particle fluence during the Stardust encounter of comet 81P/Wild 2 (Green et al. 2004). The extracted nucleus signal at 12 microns is consistent with a body of average spherical radius of 0.6 +/- 0.2 km (one standard deviation), assuming a beaming parameter of 1.2. The 4.6 micron-band signal in excess of dust and nucleus reflected and thermal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
