Complex Equiangular Tight Frames and Erasures
Thomas Hoffman, James Solazzo

TL;DR
This paper explores the differences between real and complex equiangular tight frames (ETFs), demonstrating the existence of large complex ETFs resilient to three erasures and highlighting unique properties of complex ETFs.
Contribution
It establishes the existence of large complex ETFs robust against multiple erasures and extends real ETF results to complex vector spaces, revealing fundamental differences.
Findings
Existence of arbitrarily large complex ETFs resilient to three erasures
Complex ETFs originate from a unique class
Certain real ETF results do not hold for complex ETFs
Abstract
In this paper we demonstrate that there are distinct differences between real and complex equiangular tight frames (ETFs) with regards to erasures. For example, we prove that there exist arbitrarily large non-trivial complex equiangular tight frames which are robust against three erasures, and that such frames come from a unique class of complex ETFs. In addition, we extend certain results in \cite{BP} to complex vector spaces as well as show that other results regarding real ETFs are not valid for complex ETFs.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical Analysis and Transform Methods · Rings, Modules, and Algebras
