Studying Exotic Hadrons in Heavy Ion Collisions
ExHIC Collaboration : Sungtae Cho, Takenori Furumoto, Tetsuo Hyodo,, Daisuke Jido, Che Ming Ko, Su Houng Lee, Marina Nielsen, Akira Ohnishi,, Takayasu Sekihara, Shigehiro Yasui, and Koichi Yazaki

TL;DR
This paper explores how measurements in heavy ion collisions can help identify exotic hadrons and molecular states, revealing differences in yields based on hadron structure and suggesting experimental detection possibilities.
Contribution
It compares coalescence and statistical models for exotic hadron yields, highlighting the potential for heavy ion collisions to detect multiquark states and molecules.
Findings
Compact multiquark states have lower yields than excited normal hadrons.
Loosely bound hadronic molecules are produced more abundantly than statistical predictions.
Heavy quark production at RHIC and LHC enables detection of exotic hadrons.
Abstract
We investigate the possibilities of using measurements in present and future experiments on heavy ion collisions to answer some longstanding problems in hadronic physics, namely identifying hadronic molecular states and exotic hadrons with multiquark components. The yields of a selected set of exotic hadron candidates in relativistic heavy ion collisions are discussed in the coalescence model in comparison with the statistical model. We find that the yield of a hadron is typically an order of magnitude smaller when it is a compact multiquark state, compared to that of an excited hadronic state with normal quark numbers. We also find that some loosely bound hadronic molecules are formed more abundantly than the statistical model prediction by a factor of two or more. Moreover, due to the significant numbers of charm and bottom quarks produced at RHIC and even larger numbers expected at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
