Counterexamples to Ferromagnetic Ordering of Energy Levels
Wolfgang Spitzer, Shannon Starr, Lam Tran

TL;DR
This paper presents counterexamples to the ferromagnetic ordering of energy levels in the Heisenberg model, showing that the expected monotonic energy behavior does not always hold, especially in certain ring configurations.
Contribution
It provides the first known counterexamples to FOEL in the Heisenberg ferromagnet, challenging previous assumptions and extending the understanding of energy level ordering.
Findings
Counterexamples in spin rings of length 4 to 16.
Violations of FOEL in specific graph configurations.
Implications for the Aldous ordering in symmetric exclusion processes.
Abstract
The Heisenberg ferromagnet has symmetry group . The property known as ferromagnetic ordering of energy levels (FOEL) states that the minimum energy eigenvalue among eigenvectors with total spin is monotone decreasing as a function of . While this property holds for certain graphs such as open chains, in this note we demonstrate some counterexamples. We consider the spin 1/2 model on rings of length for , and show that the minimum energy among all spin singlets is less than or equal to the minimum energy among all spin triplets, which violates FOEL. This also shows some counterexamples to the "Aldous ordering" for the symmetric exclusion process. We also review some of the literature related to these examples.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
