Mergers of black-hole binaries with aligned spins: Waveform characteristics
Bernard J. Kelly, John G. Baker, William D. Boggs, Sean T. McWilliams,, Joan Centrella

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the waveform characteristics of equal-mass aligned-spin black-hole mergers, providing a quantitative model for the merger-ringdown phase that aligns well with numerical simulations, aiding gravitational-wave detection.
Contribution
It introduces an explicit, accurate model for the merger-ringdown waveforms of aligned-spin black-hole mergers, extending previous approaches to include spin effects and improved amplitude modeling.
Findings
Waveform modes evolve in lock-step during inspiral and merger
The model fits numerical waveforms with over 95% accuracy for systems above 150 solar masses
The model is applicable for detecting intermediate-mass black-hole mergers
Abstract
We conduct a descriptive analysis of the multipolar structure of gravitational-radiation waveforms from equal-mass aligned-spin mergers, following an approach first presented in the complementary context of nonspinning black holes of varying mass ratio [J.G. Baker et al. Phys. Rev. D 78 044046 (2008)]. We find that, as with the nonspinning mergers, the dominant waveform mode phases evolve together in lock-step through inspiral and merger, supporting the previous waveform description in terms of an adiabatically rigid rotator driving gravitational-wave emission-an implicit rotating source. We further apply the late-time merger-ringdown model for the rotational frequency introduced in [J.G. Baker et al. Phys. Rev. D 78 044046 (2008)], along with an improved amplitude model appropriate for the dominant (2, \pm2) modes. This provides a quantitative description of the merger-ringdown…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
