The case for testing MOND using LISA Pathfinder
Joao Magueijo, Ali Mozaffari

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the potential of LISA Pathfinder to test Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) through saddle point flybys, analyzing signal detectability, systematics, and implications of negative results for various relativistic theories.
Contribution
It provides a detailed forecast of LISA Pathfinder's ability to detect MOND signals and classifies relativistic MOND theories based on their non-relativistic limits and response to negative results.
Findings
High signal-to-noise ratio achievable for standard parameters.
Systematics like self-gravity do not hinder detection.
Only certain theories survive negative results without contrived free-functions.
Abstract
We quantify the potential for testing MOdified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) with LISA Pathfinder (LPF), should a saddle point flyby be incorporated into the mission. We forecast the expected signal to noise ratio (SNR) for a variety of instrument noise models and trajectories past the saddle. For standard theoretical parameters the SNR reaches middle to high double figures even with modest assumptions about instrument performance and saddle approach. Obvious concerns, like systematics arising from LPF self-gravity, or the Newtonian background, are examined and shown not to be a problem. We also investigate the impact of a negative observational result upon the free-function determining the theory. We demonstrate that, if Newton's gravitational constant is constrained not be re-normalized by more than a few percent, only contrived MONDian free-functions would survive a negative result.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
