Reliability of complete gravitational waveform models for compact binary coalescences
Frank Ohme, Mark Hannam, Sascha Husa

TL;DR
This paper develops a new method to estimate the accuracy of hybrid gravitational waveforms for binary coalescences without needing existing numerical relativity data, showing that about 10 NR orbits suffice for most cases.
Contribution
It introduces an algorithm to evaluate hybrid waveform errors using equivalent PN models and common data, reducing reliance on existing NR simulations.
Findings
Approximately 10 NR orbits before merger are sufficient for accurate waveform models in most cases.
Nonspinning systems with high mass ratios are well modeled with these waveforms.
Parameter biases are around 1% for total mass and less than 0.1 for spin magnitude.
Abstract
With recent advances in post-Newtonian (PN) theory and numerical relativity (NR) it has become possible to construct inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms by combining both descriptions into one hybrid signal. While addressing the reliability of such waveforms, previous studies have identified the PN contribution as the dominant source of error, which can be reduced by incorporating longer NR simulations. Here we overcome the two outstanding issues that make it difficult to determine the minimum NR simulation length necessary to produce suitably accurate hybrids: (1) the criteria for a GW search is the mismatch between the true waveform and a set of model waveforms, optimized over all waveforms in the model, but for discrete hybrids this optimization was not yet possible. (2) these calculations typically require that numerical waveforms already exist, while we develop an algorithm to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
