Critical current measurements in superconductor - ferromagnet - superconductor junctions of $YBa_2Cu_3O_y$-$SrRuO_3$-$YBa_2Cu_3O_y$: No evidence for a dominant proximity induced triplet superconductivity in the ferromagnetic barrier
Gad Koren, Tal Kirzhner, Pavel Aronov

TL;DR
This study investigates superconductor-ferromagnet-superconductor junctions with $YBa_2Cu_3O_y$ and $SrRuO_3$, finding no evidence of dominant triplet superconductivity induced by proximity effects, based on critical current decay measurements.
Contribution
The paper provides experimental evidence showing the absence of dominant proximity-induced triplet superconductivity in $YBa_2Cu_3O_y$-$SrRuO_3$-$YBa_2Cu_3O_y$ junctions through critical current decay analysis.
Findings
Critical current densities of 7.5 and 3.5 MA/cm$^2$ in high-quality junctions.
Exponential decay of critical current with ferromagnetic barrier thickness.
Decay lengths much shorter than the coherence lengths, indicating no dominant triplet superconductivity.
Abstract
Transport measurements in ramp-type junctions of with values of either 80-90 K or 60-70 K are reported. In both type of junctions but without a barrier ("shorts"), the supercurrent densities at 4.2 K reached 7.5 and 3.5 MA/cm, respectively, indicating the high quality of the fabrication process. Plots of the critical current versus thickness of the ferromagnetic barrier at 4.2 K show exponential decays with decay lengths of 1.1 nm for the 90 K phase and 1.4 nm for the 60 K phase, which are much shorter than the relevant coherence lengths nm or 16 nm of . We thus conclude that there is no dominant proximity induced triplet superconductivity in the ferromagnet in our junctions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
