Galaxy Structure and Mode of Star Formation in the SFR-Mass Plane from z ~ 2.5 to z ~ 0.1
Stijn Wuyts, Natascha M. Forster Schreiber, Arjen van der Wel,, Benjamin Magnelli, Yicheng Guo, Reinhard Genzel, Dieter Lutz, Herve Aussel,, Guillermo Barro, Stefano Berta, Antonio Cava, Javier Gracia-Carpio, Nimish P., Hathi, Kuang-Han Huang, Dale D. Kocevski

TL;DR
This study investigates how galaxy structure and star formation modes relate to their position in the SFR-Mass plane across redshifts 0.1 to 2.5, revealing persistent correlations and evolutionary trends in galaxy morphology and star formation activity.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of galaxy structural properties and star formation modes across a wide redshift range, demonstrating the early establishment of the Hubble sequence and linking size growth to star formation activity.
Findings
Main sequence galaxies are typically exponential disks across all epochs.
Quiescent galaxies are better described by de Vaucouleurs profiles.
Size growth correlates with specific SFR and a_SFR.
Abstract
We analyze the dependence of galaxy structure (size and Sersic index) and mode of star formation (\Sigma_SFR and SFR_IR/SFR_UV) on the position of galaxies in the SFR versus Mass diagram. Our sample comprises roughly 640000 galaxies at z~0.1, 130000 galaxies at z~1, and 36000 galaxies at z~2. Structural measurements for all but the z~0.1 galaxies were based on HST imaging, and SFRs are derived using a Herschel-calibrated ladder of SFR indicators. We find that a correlation between the structure and stellar population of galaxies (i.e., a 'Hubble sequence') is already in place since at least z~2.5. At all epochs, typical star-forming galaxies on the main sequence are well approximated by exponential disks, while the profiles of quiescent galaxies are better described by de Vaucouleurs profiles. In the upper envelope of the main sequence, the relation between the SFR and Sersic index…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
