The Time-Reversal- and Parity-Violating Nuclear Potential in Chiral Effective Theory
C. M. Maekawa (1), E. Mereghetti (2), J. de Vries (3), and U. van, Kolck (2) ((1) Fundacao U., Rio Grande (2) Arizona U. (3) Groningen, KVI)

TL;DR
This paper derives the nuclear interactions violating parity and time-reversal symmetry from QCD-related sources using chiral effective theory, revealing source-dependent potentials and new two-pion-exchange contributions.
Contribution
It provides a systematic derivation of T- and P-violating nuclear potentials from QCD operators within chiral perturbation theory, including new two-pion-exchange terms.
Findings
Leading-order potential is dominated by one-pion exchange for all sources.
The theta term's potential involves only one-pion exchange, not affecting the deuteron EDM.
A new two-pion-exchange potential appears at subleading order.
Abstract
We derive the parity- and time-reversal-violating nuclear interactions stemming from the QCD theta term and quark/gluon operators of effective dimension 6: quark electric dipole moments, quark and gluon chromo-electric dipole moments, and two four-quark operators. We work in the framework of two-flavor chiral perturbation theory, where a systematic expansion is possible. The different chiral-transformation properties of the sources of time-reversal violation lead to different hadronic interactions. For all sources considered the leading-order potential involves known one-pion exchange, but its specific form and the relative importance of short-range interactions depend on the source. For the theta term, the leading potential is solely given by one-pion exchange, which does not contribute to the deuteron electric dipole moment. In subleading order, a new two-pion-exchange potential is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
