Quantifying galaxy shapes: Sersiclets and beyond
Rene Andrae, Peter Melchior, Knud Jahnke

TL;DR
This paper critically evaluates the sersiclet method for galaxy shape analysis, highlighting its limitations and proposing enhancements with higher-order profiles to improve modeling accuracy in astrophysical applications.
Contribution
The paper revisits sersiclets, identifies their conceptual and practical limitations, and suggests higher-order Taylor expansions as a promising improvement for galaxy morphology modeling.
Findings
Sersiclets overcome shapelet modeling failures.
Sersiclets are prone to undersampling issues.
Higher-order profiles can enhance galaxy image reconstructions.
Abstract
Parametrising galaxy morphologies is a challenging task, e.g., in shear measurements of weak lensing or investigations of galaxy evolution. The huge variety of morphologies requires an approach that is highly flexible, e.g., accounting for azimuthal structure. We revisit the method of sersiclets, where galaxy morphologies are decomposed into basis functions based on the Sersic profile. This approach is justified by the fact that the Sersic profile is the first-order Taylor expansion of any real light profile. We show that sersiclets overcome the modelling failures of shapelets. However, sersiclets implicate an unphysical relation between the steepness of the light profile and the spatial scale of azimuthal structures, which is not obeyed by real galaxy morphologies and can therefore give rise to modelling failures. Moreover, we demonstrate that sersiclets are prone to undersampling,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
