Application of Bayesian model inadequacy criterion for multiple data sets to radial velocity models of exoplanet systems
Mikko Tuomi, David Pinfield, and Hugh R. A. Jones

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Bayesian criterion to assess whether statistical models adequately fit multiple independent data sets, demonstrated through re-analysis of exoplanet radial velocity data revealing model inadequacies and biases.
Contribution
It develops a general Bayesian criterion for model adequacy across multiple data sets, applicable without assumptions on data or model specifics, and demonstrates its use in exoplanet radial velocity analysis.
Findings
Some models for exoplanet data are inadequate, requiring revision.
Biases were identified in the radial velocities of ion Andromedae.
Updated orbital parameters were provided for a 4-planet model.
Abstract
We present a simple mathematical criterion for determining whether a given statistical model does not describe several independent sets of measurements, or data modes, adequately. We derive this criterion for two data sets and generalise it to several sets by using the Bayesian updating of the posterior probability density. To demonstrate the usage of the criterion, we apply it to observations of exoplanet host stars by re-analysing the radial velocities of HD 217107, Gliese 581, and \u{psion} Andromedae and show that the currently used models are not necessarily adequate in describing the properties of these measurements. We show that while the two data sets of Gliese 581 can be modelled reasonably well, the noise model of HD 217107 needs to be revised. We also reveal some biases in the radial velocities of \u{psion} Andromedae and report updated orbital parameters for the recently…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
