Connection and Dispersion of Computation
Koji Kobayashi

TL;DR
This paper explores how connection and dispersion affect computational complexity, analyzing HornCNF and CNF, and concludes that certain reductions are impossible, implying P ≠ NP.
Contribution
It introduces new concepts like inner products and analyzes their impact on MUC, providing insights into the separation of complexity classes.
Findings
HornMUC cannot be reduced to Orthogonalization MUC in polynomial size
DP is not equal to P, and NP is not equal to P
Differences between CNFSAT and HornSAT are highlighted
Abstract
This paper talk about the influence of Connection and Dispersion on Computational Complexity. And talk about the HornCNF's connection and CNF's dispersion, and show the difference between CNFSAT and HornSAT. First, I talk the relation between MUC decision problem and classifying the truth value assignment. Second, I define the two inner products ("inner product" and "inner harmony") and talk about the influence of orthogonal and correlation to MUC. And we can not reduce MUC to Orthogonalization MUC by using HornMUC in polynomial size because HornMUC have high orthogonal of inner harmony and MUC do not. So DP is not P, and NP is not P.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeural Networks and Applications
