Comment on "Semiquantum secret sharing using entangled states"
Jason Lin, Chun-Wei Yang, Chia-Wei Tsai, and Tzonelih Hwang

TL;DR
This paper critiques recent semi-quantum secret sharing protocols, identifying security vulnerabilities in their eavesdropping checks and proposing solutions to prevent potential attacks that could compromise the secret.
Contribution
It highlights security flaws in existing protocols and offers two solutions to enhance their robustness against specific attack strategies.
Findings
Security pitfalls in eavesdropping check phases identified
Potential for intercept-resend and Trojan horse attacks
Proposed solutions to prevent security breaches
Abstract
Recently, Li et al. [Phys. Rev. A, 82(2), 022303] presented two semi-quantum secret sharing (SQSS) protocols using GHZ-like states. The proposed schemes are rather practical because only the secret dealer requires to equip with advanced quantum devices such as quantum memory, whereas the other agents can merely perform classical operations to complete the secret sharing. However, this study points out that a security pitfall exists in the eavesdropping check phase of both schemes that could mount to an Intercept-resend attack and a Trojan horse attack on the two schemes, respectively, to disclose the other agent's shadow, and further to reveal the master key of the SQSS, which contradicts to the security requirement of a QSS. Fortunately, two possible solutions are proposed to avoid this security pitfall.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
