Distinguishability of infinite groups and graphs
Simon M. Smith, Thomas W. Tucker, Mark E. Watkins

TL;DR
This paper proves that various classes of infinite graphs and groups have a distinguishing number of 2, meaning they can be distinguished with just two colors, using a key lemma called the Distinct Spheres Lemma.
Contribution
The paper introduces the Distinct Spheres Lemma and applies it to show that many infinite graphs and primitive groups are 2-distinguishable, extending previous results.
Findings
Connected primitive graphs with infinite diameter have distinguishing number 2.
Infinite primitive, locally finite graphs are 2-distinguishable.
Vertex-transitive graphs with connectivity 1 and Cartesian products of infinite diameter graphs are 2-distinguishable.
Abstract
The {\em distinguishing number} of a group acting faithfully on a set is the least number of colors needed to color the elements of so that no non-identity element of the group preserves the coloring. The {\em distinguishing number} of a graph is the distinguishing number of its full automorphism group acting on its vertex set. A connected graph is said to have {\em connectivity 1} if there exists a vertex such that is not connected. For , an orbit of the point stabilizer is called a {\em suborbit} of . We prove that every connected primitive graph with infinite diameter and countably many vertices has distinguishing number 2. Consequently, any infinite, connected, primitive, locally finite graph is 2-distinguishable; so, too, is any infinite primitive group with finite suborbits. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGraph Labeling and Dimension Problems
