Comment on "A new exactly solvable quantum model in $N$ dimensions" [Phys. Lett. A 375(2011)1431, arXiv:1007.1335]
B. L. Moreno Ley, Shi-Hai Dong

TL;DR
This paper critiques a previously proposed quantum model, arguing that due to flaws in the position-dependent mass Hamiltonian, it does not qualify as a genuinely new or valuable exactly solvable model in physics.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis showing that the earlier model's flaws undermine its status as an exactly solvable quantum system.
Findings
The proposed Hamiltonian has fundamental flaws.
The model's solvability is compromised by its flaws.
It questions the physical relevance of the earlier model.
Abstract
We pinpoint that the work about "a new exactly solvable quantum model in dimensions" by Ballesteros et al. [Phys. Lett. A {\bf 375} (2011) 1431, arXiv:1007.1335] is not a new exactly solvable quantum model since the flaw of the position-dependent mass Hamiltonian proposed by them makes it less valuable in physics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
