Constraining Type Ia Supernovae progenitors from three years of SNLS data
F. B. Bianco, D. A. Howell, M. Sullivan, A. Conley, D. Kasen, S., Gonzalez-Gaitan, J. Guy, P. Astier, C. Balland, R. G. Carlberg, D. Fouchez,, N. Fourmanoit, D. Hardin, I. Hook, C. Lidman, R. Pain, N., Palanque-Delabrouille, S. Perlmutter, K. M. Perrett, C. J. Pritchet, N.

TL;DR
This study analyzes three years of SNLS data to detect signs of non-degenerate companions in Type Ia supernovae, constraining their contribution to less than 10-20% based on early lightcurve features.
Contribution
It introduces a method to identify binary companions in supernova progenitors by comparing observed and synthetic lightcurves, providing new constraints on progenitor models.
Findings
White dwarf-red giant binary contribution <10% at 2 sigma
No significant flux excess detected in early lightcurves
Method constrains progenitor scenarios using Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests
Abstract
While it is generally accepted that Type Ia supernovae are the result of the explosion of a carbon-oxygen White Dwarf accreting mass in a binary system, the details of their genesis still elude us, and the nature of the binary companion is uncertain. Kasen (2010) points out that the presence of a non-degenerate companion in the progenitor system could leave an observable trace: a flux excess in the early rise portion of the lightcurve caused by the ejecta impact with the companion itself. This excess would be observable only under favorable viewing angles, and its intensity depends on the nature of the companion. We searched for the signature of a non-degenerate companion in three years of Supernova Legacy Survey data by generating synthetic lightcurves accounting for the effects of shocking and comparing true and synthetic time series with Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests. Our most…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
