Shadow movies not arising from knots
Daniel Denton, Peter Doyle

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that not all sequences of shadow diagrams (shadow movies) correspond to actual sequences of classical knot diagrams (Reidemeister movies), impacting the interpretation of virtual crossings in knot theory.
Contribution
It proves that some shadow movies cannot be realized as classical Reidemeister movies, revealing limitations in the virtual knot framework.
Findings
Not all shadow movies arise from Reidemeister movies.
Virtual crossings cannot always be interpreted as classical crossings with undetermined over/under information.
Implications for the theory of virtual knots and their relation to classical knots.
Abstract
A shadow diagram is a knot diagram with under-over information omitted; a shadow movie is a sequence of shadow diagrams related by shadow Reidemeister moves. We show that not every shadow movie arises as the shadow of a Reidemeister movie, meaning a sequence of classical knot diagrams related by classical Reidemeister moves. This means that in Kaufman's theory of virtual knots, virtual crossings cannot simply be viewed as classical crossings where which strand is over has been left `to be determined'.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric and Algebraic Topology · Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
