The Morphology of Galaxies in the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey
Karen L. Masters (ICG Portsmouth/SEPnet), Claudia Maraston (ICG, Portsmouth), Robert C. Nichol (ICG Portsmouth/SEPnet), Daniel Thomas (ICG, Portsmouth/SEPnet), Alessandra Beifiori (ICG Portsmouth), Kevin Bundy, (Berkeley), Edward M. Edmondson (ICG Portsmouth), Tim D. Higgs (ICG

TL;DR
This study analyzes the morphology of BOSS galaxies using HST imaging, revealing that most are early-type, with implications for galaxy evolution and cosmological measurements.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed morphological analysis of BOSS galaxies, linking visual types to color cuts and highlighting potential merger activity.
Findings
74% of galaxies are early-type morphologies
A (g-i)>2.35 color cut yields 90% early-type selection
At least 50% of unresolved systems are real associations
Abstract
We study the morphology of luminous and massive galaxies at 0.3<z<0.7 targeted in the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) using publicly available Hubble Space Telescope imaging from COSMOS. Our sample (240 objects) provides a unique opportunity to check the visual morphology of these galaxies which were targeted based solely on stellar population modelling. We find that the majority (74+/-6%) possess an early-type morphology (elliptical or S0), while the remainder have a late-type morphology. This is as expected from the goals of the BOSS target selection which aimed to predominantly select slowly evolving galaxies, for use as cosmological probes, while still obtaining a fair fraction of actively star forming galaxies for galaxy evolution studies. We show that a colour cut of (g-i)>2.35 selects a sub-sample of BOSS galaxies with 90% early-type morphology - more comparable to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
