
TL;DR
This paper revisits a commonly used relation in B_s-mixing studies, clarifying its limitations and utility in estimating penguin contributions rather than eliminating theoretical uncertainties.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the relation cannot eliminate the theory prediction for 2 but can help estimate penguin effects in B_s decays.
Findings
The relation is not suitable for removing 2 theory uncertainties.
It can be used to estimate penguin contributions.
Current theory predictions for 2 have limited precision.
Abstract
We reinvestigate a simple relation between the semileptonic CP asymmetry a_{sl}^s, the decay rate difference \Delta \Gamma_s, the mass difference \Delta M_s and S_{\psi \phi} extracted from the angular analysis of the decay B_s \to \psi \phi, which is regularly used in the literature. We find that this relation is not suited to eliminate the theory prediction for \Gamma_{12}, it can, however be used to determine the size of the penguin contributions to the decay B_s \to \psi \phi. Moreover we comment on the current precision of the theory prediction for \Gamma_{12}.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
