The Impact of Metallicity on the Rate of Type Ia Supernovae
Matthew D. Kistler (Caltech, UC Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley National, Laboratory), K. Z. Stanek (Ohio State University), Christopher S. Kochanek, (Ohio State University), Jose L. Prieto (Carnegie Observatories), Todd A., Thompson (Ohio State University)

TL;DR
This paper proposes that lower metallicity in galaxies increases the rate of Type Ia supernovae by producing higher-mass white dwarfs, challenging previous assumptions of metallicity independence.
Contribution
It introduces a model linking metallicity to SN Ia rates, explaining observed variations across galaxy types and cosmic history, and highlights the need for detailed metallicity measurements.
Findings
Lower-metallicity galaxies have higher SN Ia rates.
Models including metallicity effects match observed data well.
The metallicity effect influences cosmic SN Ia rate estimates.
Abstract
The metallicity of a star strongly affects both its evolution and the properties of the stellar remnant that results from its demise. It is generally accepted that stars with initial masses below ~8 M_sun leave behind white dwarfs and that some sub-population of these lead to Type Ia supernovae. However, it is often tacitly assumed that metallicity has no effect on the rate of SNe Ia. We propose that a consequence of the effects of metallicity is to significantly increase the SN Ia rate in lower-metallicity galaxies, in contrast to previous expectations. This is because lower-metallicity stars leave behind higher-mass white dwarfs, which should be easier to bring to explosion. We first model SN Ia rates in relation to galaxy masses and ages alone, finding that the elevation in the rate of SNe Ia in lower-mass galaxies measured by LOSS is readily explained. However, we then see that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
