Disorder-dependent superconducting phase-diagram at high magnetic fields in Fe$_{1 + y}$Se$_{x}$Te$_{1-x}$ ($x \sim 0.4$)
T. Gebre, G. Li, J. B. Whalen, B. S. Conner, H. D. Zhou, G., Grissonanche, M. K. Kostov, A. Gurevich, T. Siegrist, and L. Balicas

TL;DR
This study investigates how disorder affects the high-field superconducting phase diagram of Fe$_{1+y}$Se$_{0.4}$Te$_{0.6}$ crystals, revealing that stoichiometric disorder impairs superconductivity, with findings supported by structural, compositional, and fluctuation analyses.
Contribution
It demonstrates that stoichiometric disorder, rather than structural disorder, significantly influences the high-field superconducting phase diagram in FeSeTe crystals.
Findings
Annealed samples show higher Hc2/Tc ratios.
Superconducting fluctuations exhibit two-dimensional behavior.
Stoichiometric disorder negatively impacts the phase diagram.
Abstract
We compare the superconducting phase-diagram under high magnetic fields (up to T) of FeSeTe single crystals originally grown by the Bridgman-Stockbarger (BRST) technique, which were annealed to display narrow superconducting transitions and the optimal transition temperature K, with the diagram for samples of similar stoichiometry grown by the traveling-solvent floating-zone technique as well as with the phase-diagram reported for crystals grown by a self-flux method. We find that the so-annealed samples tend to display higher ratios , particularly for fields applied along the inter-planar direction, where the upper critical field exhibits a pronounced downward curvature followed by saturation at lower temperatures . This last observation is consistent with previous studies indicating that this system is Pauli…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
