On the Status of the Geodesic Principle in Newtonian and Relativistic Physics
James Owen Weatherall

TL;DR
This paper compares the status of the geodesic principle in Newtonian and relativistic physics, showing that similar theorems establish it as a fundamental result in both frameworks.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the geodesic principle holds as a theorem in both geometrized Newtonian gravitation and General Relativity, highlighting their conceptual similarities.
Findings
The geodesic principle is a theorem in both theories.
Similar interpretations of the theorems in Newtonian and relativistic contexts.
The status of the geodesic principle is comparable in both frameworks.
Abstract
A theorem due to Bob Geroch and Pong Soo Jang ["Motion of a Body in General Relativity." Journal of Mathematical Physics 16(1), (1975)] provides a sense in which the geodesic principle has the status of a theorem in General Relativity (GR). I have recently shown that a similar theorem holds in the context of geometrized Newtonian gravitation (Newton-Cartan theory) [Weatherall, J. O. "The Motion of a Body in Newtonian Theories." Journal of Mathematical Physics 52(3), (2011)]. Here I compare the interpretations of these two theorems. I argue that despite some apparent differences between the theorems, the status of the geodesic principle in geometrized Newtonian gravitation is, mutatis mutandis, strikingly similar to the relativistic case.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
