A lower mass for the exoplanet WASP-21b
S. C. C. Barros (1), D. L. Pollacco (1), N. P. Gibson (1,2), I. D., Howarth (3), F. P. Keenan (1), E. K. Simpson (1), I. Skillen (4), I. A., Steele (5). (1- Queen's University Belfast, 2-University of Oxford, 3-UCL, 4-, INT,5-Liverpool John Moores University)

TL;DR
This study refines the properties of exoplanet WASP-21b using high-precision transit data, revealing a lower planetary mass and radius, and suggesting the host star is evolving off the main sequence, which impacts previous estimates.
Contribution
The paper provides more accurate system parameters for WASP-21b by analyzing new high-precision transit observations and revising stellar and planetary characteristics.
Findings
WASP-21's stellar mass is revised to 0.86 Msun from 1.01 Msun.
The planetary mass is determined to be 0.27 Mjup, lower than previous estimates.
No transit timing variations were detected in WASP-21b.
Abstract
We present high precision transit observations of the exoplanet WASP-21b, obtained with the RISE instrument mounted on 2.0m Liverpool Telescope. A transit model is fitted, coupled with an MCMC routine to derive accurate system parameters. The two new high precision transits allow to estimate the stellar density directly from the light curve. Our analysis suggests that WASP-21 is evolving off the main sequence which led to a previous overestimation of the stellar density. Using isochrone interpolation, we find a stellar mass of 0.86 \pm 0.04 Msun which is significantly lower than previously reported (1.01 \pm 0.03 Msun). Consequently, we find a lower planetary mass of . A lower inclination (87.4 \pm 0.3 degrees) is also found for the system than previously reported, resulting in a slightly larger stellar (R_* =1.10 \pm 0.03 Rsun) and planetary radius (R_p = 1.14 \pm…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
