Real versus Complex Volumes on Real Algebraic Surfaces
Arnaud Moncet (IRMAR)

TL;DR
This paper introduces the concept of concordance to compare real and complex volumes on real algebraic surfaces, revealing relationships with automorphisms, entropy, and deformation properties.
Contribution
It defines the concordance for real algebraic surfaces and explores its connections with automorphisms, entropy, and deformation, providing new bounds and examples.
Findings
Concordance equals 1 for surfaces with Picard number 1.
Automorphisms with positive entropy bound the concordance from above.
Existence of K3 surfaces with arbitrarily small concordance.
Abstract
Let X be a real algebraic surface. The comparison between the volume of real and complex loci of ample divisors D brings us to define the concordance, which is a number between 0 and 1. This number equals 1 when the Picard number is 1, and for some surfaces with a "quite simple" nef cone, e.g. Del Pezzo surfaces. For abelian surfaces, it is 1/2 or 1, depending on the existence or not of positive entropy automorphisms on X. In the general case, the existence of such an automorphism gives an upper bound for the concordance, namely the ratio of entropies in real and complex loci of X. Moreover the concordance is equal to this ratio when the Picard number is 2. An interesting consequence of the inequality is the non-density of the automorphisms in the group of diffeomorphisms of the real surface X(R), as soon as the concordance is positive. Finally we show, thanks to this upper bound, that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
