Inducing Interpretable Voting Classifiers without Trading Accuracy for Simplicity: Theoretical Results, Approximation Algorithms
R. Nock

TL;DR
This paper explores the balance between interpretability and accuracy in voting classifiers, providing theoretical insights and introducing WIDC, an efficient heuristic that produces small, accurate, and interpretable classifiers.
Contribution
It offers the first weak learning framework-based voting classifier induction method, along with theoretical analysis of simplicity-accuracy tradeoffs and empirical validation.
Findings
WIDC produces small, accurate, and interpretable classifiers.
Theoretical results highlight the hardness of the simplicity-accuracy tradeoff.
Experimental results on 31 domains demonstrate WIDC's effectiveness.
Abstract
Recent advances in the study of voting classification algorithms have brought empirical and theoretical results clearly showing the discrimination power of ensemble classifiers. It has been previously argued that the search of this classification power in the design of the algorithms has marginalized the need to obtain interpretable classifiers. Therefore, the question of whether one might have to dispense with interpretability in order to keep classification strength is being raised in a growing number of machine learning or data mining papers. The purpose of this paper is to study both theoretically and empirically the problem. First, we provide numerous results giving insight into the hardness of the simplicity-accuracy tradeoff for voting classifiers. Then we provide an efficient "top-down and prune" induction heuristic, WIDC, mainly derived from recent results on the weak learning…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
