Conductance spectroscopy of a correlated superconductor in a magnetic field in the Pauli limit: Evidence for strong correlations
Jan Kaczmarczyk, Mariusz Sadzikowski, and Jozef Spa{\l}ek

TL;DR
This paper investigates conductance spectra of a correlated superconductor under magnetic fields, revealing how strong correlations modify spectral features, providing a potential experimental signature for identifying correlation effects.
Contribution
It introduces a model incorporating strong correlations via the Gutzwiller method into conductance spectroscopy analysis of superconductors in magnetic fields, highlighting differences from uncorrelated cases.
Findings
Correlations reduce the spin-split conductance peak distance by 30-50%.
Conductance features differ significantly between correlated and uncorrelated superconductors.
The effects are more pronounced in BCS superconductors than in FFLO states.
Abstract
We study conductance spectroscopy of a two-dimensional junction between a normal metal and a strongly-correlated superconductor in an applied magnetic field in the Pauli limit. Depending on the field strength the superconductor is either in the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS), or in the Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov (FFLO) state of the Fulde-Ferrell (FF) type. The strong correlations are accounted for by means of the Gutzwiller method what leads naturally to the emergence of the spin-dependent masses (SDM) of quasiparticles when the system is spin-polarized. The case without strong correlations (with the spin-independent masses, SIM) is analyzed for comparison. We consider both the s-wave and the d-wave symmetries of the superconducting gap and concentrate on the parallel orientation of the Cooper pair momentum Q with respect to the junction interface. The junction conductance is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
