Low-Resolution Sodium D Absorption is a Bad Proxy for Extinction
Dovi Poznanski, Mohan Ganeshaligam, Jeffrey M. Silverman, Alexei V., Filippenko

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that low-resolution sodium D absorption measurements are unreliable proxies for dust extinction in supernovae, due to their weak correlation and high scatter.
Contribution
The paper provides a comprehensive analysis showing the poor correlation between Na I D equivalent width and dust extinction in supernovae using a large dataset.
Findings
Na I D absorption barely correlates with dust extinction
High scatter prevents reliable extinction inference from Na I D
Low-resolution spectra are inadequate for accurate extinction estimation
Abstract
Dust extinction is generally the least tractable systematic uncertainty in astronomy, and particularly in supernova science. Often in the past, studies have used the equivalent width of Na I D absorption measured from low-resolution spectra as proxies for extinction, based on tentative correlations that were drawn from limited data sets. We show here, based on 443 low-resolution spectra of 172 Type Ia supernovae for which we have measured the dust extinction as well as the equivalent width of Na I D, that the two barely correlate. We briefly examine the causes for this large scatter that effectively prevents one from inferring extinction using this method.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
