Comprehensive understanding of size-, shape-, and composition-dependent polarizabilities of SimCn (m, n = 1-4) clusters
You-Zhao Lan, Hong-Lan Kang, Tao Niu

TL;DR
This study theoretically explores how size, shape, and composition influence the polarizabilities of SimCn clusters (m, n=1-4), revealing complex dependencies and introducing a new charge redistribution parameter for better understanding.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of polarizability dependencies on size, shape, and composition, and introduces a new parameter ({}q) to better understand polarizability evolution.
Findings
Shape significantly influences polarizability, with linear > prolate > compact.
Linear clusters exhibit larger polarizabilities than prolate and compact ones.
Binding energy and charge redistribution ({}q) better reflect polarizability evolution than energy gap.
Abstract
We theoretically investigate the size-, shape-, and composition-dependent polarizabilities of the SimCn (m, n = 1 - 4) clusters by using the density functional based coupled perturbed Hartree-Fock method. The size-dependence of the polarizabilities of the SimCn (m, n = 1 - 4) clusters is more complicated than that of pure Sim and Cn (m, n = 1 - 8) clusters because for a given cluster size the heteroatomic clusters have more isomers than the homoatomic ones. For the shape-dependence, we consider three kinds of shape, linear (chain), prolate, and compact. For most clusters, we can clearly observe orders of {\alpha}(linear) > {\alpha}(prolate) and {\alpha}(prolate) > {\alpha}(compact) for a given composition. The composition-dependence of polarizabilities reveals that the linear clusters have an obvious larger polarizability than both the prolate and the compact clusters especially for a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
