
TL;DR
This paper explores how the geometry of tensor network states influences their structural properties and correlations, providing a unifying framework that links different tensor network types and their physical interpretations.
Contribution
It introduces a geometric perspective on tensor network states, explaining how their structure determines correlation decay and entanglement scaling across various models.
Findings
Correlation decay is governed by geodesics in the network's geometry.
Entanglement entropy always follows a boundary law in the relevant geometry.
The geometric framework unifies understanding of different tensor network states.
Abstract
Tensor network states are used to approximate ground states of local Hamiltonians on a lattice in D spatial dimensions. Different types of tensor network states can be seen to generate different geometries. Matrix product states (MPS) in D=1 dimensions, as well as projected entangled pair states (PEPS) in D>1 dimensions, reproduce the D-dimensional physical geometry of the lattice model; in contrast, the multi-scale entanglement renormalization ansatz (MERA) generates a (D+1)-dimensional holographic geometry. Here we focus on homogeneous tensor networks, where all the tensors in the network are copies of the same tensor, and argue that certain structural properties of the resulting many-body states are preconditioned by the geometry of the tensor network and are therefore largely independent of the choice of variational parameters. Indeed, the asymptotic decay of correlations in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
