Robust Agent Teams via Socially-Attentive Monitoring
G. A. Kaminka, M. Tambe

TL;DR
This paper investigates how much monitoring is necessary for effective failure detection in multi-agent teams, proposing socially-attentive algorithms that balance correctness, completeness, and monitoring effort in dynamic environments.
Contribution
It introduces and empirically evaluates socially-attentive monitoring algorithms that efficiently detect teamwork failures with limited monitoring, contrasting centralized and distributed approaches.
Findings
Distributed monitoring achieves correct and complete failure detection with limited knowledge.
Centralized algorithms trade correctness for completeness and require monitoring all agents.
The system generalizes to various coordination relationships and supports online and offline diagnosis.
Abstract
Agents in dynamic multi-agent environments must monitor their peers to execute individual and group plans. A key open question is how much monitoring of other agents' states is required to be effective: The Monitoring Selectivity Problem. We investigate this question in the context of detecting failures in teams of cooperating agents, via Socially-Attentive Monitoring, which focuses on monitoring for failures in the social relationships between the agents. We empirically and analytically explore a family of socially-attentive teamwork monitoring algorithms in two dynamic, complex, multi-agent domains, under varying conditions of task distribution and uncertainty. We show that a centralized scheme using a complex algorithm trades correctness for completeness and requires monitoring all teammates. In contrast, a simple distributed teamwork monitoring algorithm results in correct and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
