Verification of high-energy transport codes on the basis of activation data
Yu. E. Titarenko, V. F. Batyaev, M. A. Butko, D. V. Dikarev, S. N., Florya, K. V. Pavlov, A. Yu. Titarenko, R. S. Tikhonov, V. M. Zhivun, A. V., Ignatyuk, S. G. Mashnik, A. Boudard, S. Leray, J.-C. David, J. Cugnon, D., Mancusi, Y. Yariv, H. Kumawat, K. Nishihara, N. Matsuda

TL;DR
This study evaluates the accuracy of various high-energy transport codes in predicting nuclide production cross sections by comparing simulations with experimental data from ITEP and GSI, highlighting areas for code improvement.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive validation of multiple high-energy transport codes against experimental activation data across a wide energy range.
Findings
General agreement between ITEP and GSI data.
Deviation factors vary by code and target.
Recommendations for code improvements.
Abstract
Nuclide production cross sections measured at ITEP for the targets of nat-Cr, 56-Fe, nat-Ni, 93-Nb, 181-Ta, nat-W, nat-Pb, 209-Bi irradiated by protons with energies from 40 to 2600 MeV were used to estimate the predictive accuracy of several popular high-energy transport codes. A general agreement of the ITEP data with the data obtained by other groups, including the numerous GSI data measured by the inverse kinematics method was found. Simulations of the measured data were performed with the MCNPX (Bertini and ISABEL options), CEM03.02, INCL4.2+ABLA, INCL4.5+ABLA07, PHITS, and CASCADE.07 codes. Deviation factors between the calculated and experimental cross sections have been estimated for each target and for the whole energy range covered by our measurements. Two-dimensional diagrams of deviation factor values were produced for estimating the predictive power of every code for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
