Using Context to Improve the Evaluation of Information Retrieval Systems
Abdelkrim Bouramoul, Mohamed-Khireddine Kholladi, Bich-Lien Doan

TL;DR
This paper proposes a novel context-aware evaluation approach for information retrieval systems, addressing limitations of traditional methods by considering user context, query-document adequacy, and search tool characteristics, demonstrated through experiments with major search engines.
Contribution
It introduces a new multi-level evaluation method incorporating context, improving the assessment of search engine performance beyond classic approaches.
Findings
Search engines' ability to reject irrelevant results depends on query formulation and site policies.
Context-aware evaluation reveals a decline in perceived relevance as more results are considered.
The approach is applicable to real-world search tools like Google, Bing, and Yahoo.
Abstract
The crucial role of the evaluation in the development of the information retrieval tools is useful evidence to improve the performance of these tools and the quality of results that they return. However, the classic evaluation approaches have limitations and shortcomings especially regarding to the user consideration, the measure of the adequacy between the query and the returned documents and the consideration of characteristics, specifications and behaviors of the search tool. Therefore, we believe that the exploitation of contextual elements could be a very good way to evaluate the search tools. So, this paper presents a new approach that takes into account the context during the evaluation process at three complementary levels. The experiments gives at the end of this article has shown the applicability of the proposed approach to real research tools. The tests were performed with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
